Peer Assessment

1.Peer Assessment Sheet:  Oral Presentation (Global Issues/English-speaking Countries)

Name of peer assessor    _____________________________________

Feedback on individual performances Name of presenter A strength A weakness Next time? What can they improve on?
To help you decide on the strengths and weaknesses, consider the following aspects of an oral performance:

·               Volume

·               Pitch

·               Eye-contact Content (Interesting?
Accurate?)

·               Posture

·               Facial expression

·               Use of notes as a prompt

 

(You might like to add other aspects of a performance to assess.)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Group Feedback
Consider the following aspects of the performance:

·         Use of visual aids

·         The way the information was sequenced or organised

·         The introduction

·         The conclusion

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.Small Group Discussion

 

Category Excellent Good Satisfactory Poor
Information All information presented in the discussion was clear, accurate and thorough Most information presented in the discussion was clear, accurate and thorough Most information presented in the discussion was clear and accurate, but was not usually thorough Information had several inaccuracies OR was usually not clear
Use of Facts/Statistics Every major point was well supported with several relevant facts, statistics and/or examples Every major point was adequately supported with relevant facts, statistics and/or examples Every major point was supported with facts, statistics and/or examples, but the relevance of some was questionable Every point was not supported
Enthusiasm Facial expressions and body language generate a strong interest and enthusiasm about the topic in others Facial expressions and body language sometimes generate a strong interest and enthusiasm about the topic in others Facial expressions and body language are used to try to generate enthusiasm, but seem somewhat faked Very little use of facial expressions or body language. Did not generate much interest in topic being presented
Level of Engagement Asks appropriate questions on a regular basis

 

Actively engages others in discussions by inviting their comments

 

Constructively challenges the accuracy and relevance of statements made

 

Effectively identifies and summarizes main points

Contributes by offering ideas and asking questions on a regular basis

 

Often engages others by inviting their comments

 

Challenges the accuracy and relevance of statements made

 

Identifies and summarizes main points

Occasionally contributes by offering ideas and asking questions

 

Sometimes engages others in discussions

 

Sometimes has an understanding of main points

 

Identifies and summarizes some of the main points

Fails to contribute

 

Fails to invite comment/opinions from other students

 

Demonstrates little understanding of main points

 

Does not identify or summarize main points

Understanding of Assigned Readings Sophisticated understanding of readings; Noticed more than the average student; Is able to draw on readings in creative ways to interpret the texts Good, average understanding of readings; Significant use of readings in discussing the interpretation of the texts Poor understanding Absent
Appropriateness and clarity of contribution to group discussion Speaks clearly and coherently; Kind in disagreement; Makes substantial contribution; Does not dominate conversation Makes substantial contribution; Generally clear and understandable; Contributions are focused in keeping with the questions being discussed Little or no contribution; May be angry or hostile toward other members Absent
Meeting deadlines Completed assigned work ahead of time Completed assigned work on time Needed some reminding, work was late but it didn’t impact grade Needed much reminding, work was late and it did impact quality or grade

 

 

 

 

Advertisements